Sunday, 21 June 2015

Activity 5: Professional Connection Map

Create a blog post where you draw a map which demonstrates your current and potential professional connections. Based on the map, make goal(s) for extending your professional connections.

What other professional communities intersect with or lie at the borders of your own profession? What impact do these communities have on your practice and professional community?

When I started my professional connections map, I thought that it would be simple. Oh how wrong I was! As I continued to build my map I realised that there are multiple layers and various types of connections, with many going two ways and linking to other connections.




The green and blue indicates regular connections (with blue being broken into more specific connections). These connections are strong and are engaged with frequently through face-to-face interactions, discussions, collaboration, emails and meetings.
The purple connections indicate current connections, however they could be better utilised through a stronger relationship. In particular, I would like to engage and strengthen the relationship with the whanau / parents / aiga with the students at my school. I believe that these people are an excellent untapped resource and that I need to build a mutual relationship (ideally through their children) so that they are more likely to attend student conferences, accompany us on trips and volunteer to take specialised groups such as sports or cultural groups.

The red connections indicate potential professional connections that I would like to explore further in order to extend my capacity as an educator. Some of these connections I would like to establish through face-to-face contact, particularly with staff from those schools who form part of the Ako Hiko Cluster. I know from informal discussions with colleagues at my own school that there are skilled digital teachers that I could liaise with and receive professional development from.  With the use of technology such as skype, twitter, facebooks and blogging I can extend these professional connections on a global scale, not only to benefit my own teaching practice, but to also maximise the learning opportunities for my students. Doing so would help to strengthen ties for students with their “home countries”, which would in turn support relationships with whanau.



What are or what would be the benefits and challenges of working in a more interdisciplinary environment?
Interdisciplinary can be defined as “bringing together two or more things under one roof… in a conscious manner” (Mathison & Freeman, 1997, p.11). In a primary setting, this could mean integrating two subjects together, regardless of the methods, processes, points of view or skills taught. Mathison & Freeman (1997) summarise the interdisciplinary approach as “always consciously (combining) two or more disciples and keeps them distinct and in focus.” The approach is largely teacher directed, with clear objectives and a focus on inquiry skills.

The benefits of working in a more interdisciplinary environment would be that I could utilise human resources that are not necessarily teacher related. For example, using digital experts to show me/ trial new things in my classroom. This type of relationship would not only allow new experiences for my students, but would also allow me to step out of my comfort zone by upskilling and making professional connections.

Social media has played a large part in helping to establish and maintain professional connections. It is the easiest way with individuals being so busy. Online discussions have allowed me to spark off the ideas of others, and the collaborative approach benefits everyone.

The major challenge is time. In a profession where the job never ends, there is never enough time to develop connections, particularly face-to-face connections. Technology has proved advantageous as things can be organised via email which can be responded to when parties are free.

Another challenge is remembering to utilise the current resources available, whether that be a staff member, or someone in the local community. More often than not, there is someone willing to help, and that information usually arises from informal conversations, hence the need for face-to-face discussions. Tapping into other outside agencies and business that can come into the school (for example: Bunnings who came to help build our worm farm) is another excellent resource. Again, the time is the major barrier when setting up these relationships.


I believe, that as we move away from the traditional forms of teaching, an interdisciplinary approach is needed in order to foster citizens who are ready to participate in a global environment.



References:

   Mathison, S. & Freeman, M. (1997). The Logic of Interdisciplinary Studies. National Research Center on English Learning & Achievement.

Saturday, 20 June 2015

Activity 4: Your Professional Community

Create a blog post where you define and evaluate the community of your professional context.


1. Who are the stakeholders of your professional community? In what ways do they influence your practice?


Within the professional community that I work in there are many stakeholders. At the forefront there are the students and staff, and the Board of Trustees, but this actually extends out to the families, whanau and aiga and local businesses within our community.


Our students are the reason we do what we do. The way we teach and the opportunities we provide. The skills, values and attitudes that we foster within them. Their interests, personalities and backgrounds have a major influence on the what and how we teach.


The staff at my school also make up a significant proportion of stakeholders in that they are the most valuable resource we have to offer our students and other staff. We are fortunate enough to have a strong team of teachers who all bring specialized skills and who are all willing to bring their “A game” into the classroom every single day. These people influence my practice as I can draw upon their knowledge and expertise as a way of improving my own teaching.

Our board of trustees, families and local businesses impact on the culture of the school. They work alongside teachers as we all have the same goal of ensuring that our students get the best education that they deserve.




2. What are the current issues in your community? How would you or your community address them?

Our community is multicultural with many of our students being Pasifika, Maori or African. As a result, many of our students our second language learners. Our school is situated in a low-socioeconomic area. While our students come from a variety of backgrounds, our school and community aim to promote:
  • Achievement and success for all students (by catering for individual abilities)
  • An emphasis on high quality literacy and numeracy programmes
  • Provide a wide range of sporting and art opportunities
  • Integrate and regular use of information technology to support children’s learning
  • High quality professional development for staff

Our community makes a conscious effort to provide our students with the best possible education and that means allowing them opportunities to develop 21st century skills through access to digital devices with the support of the Ako Hiko Education Trust





3. What are the core values that underpin your profession and how?


Within New Zealand, the core values that underpin education are those that help foster and develop 21st century citizens who can contribute effectively to society.

At our school, the values are a combination of those set out by the The New Zealand Curriculum, our school’s strategic plan and our stakeholders.

Our school’s mission statement of “Value yourself, Value your learning, and respect all others” is embedded throughout everything we do within our school.  These values have been established in consultation with our community and are culturally responsive.

Our mission statement is upheld and expressed through everyday actions and interactions within the school. As part of being a PB4L (Positive Behaviour for Learning) School, our students, staff and whanau collaborated on establishing what an “Ideal Student” looks like in our school. This very much drives the what and how we teach as we foster and nurture our global citizens of the future.



4. What are the challenges that you face in your practice?

There are many challenges that I (my students, and colleagues) face daily.


Some of these include:
  • Cultural factors - our learning community is multicultural with over 14 different ethnic groups. Different cultures have different ways of learning, so it is important that I know my learners and their backgrounds. With such a diverse community, this is also means that most of the students within our school are second language learners, with many of their parents being born overseas.
  • Political factors - in terms of teaching, learning and assessment, there are issues and concerns around reporting back to parents against national standards, particularly for migrant and refugee students with very limited English skills.
  • Social factors - our school is situated in what is deemed to be a low-socio economic area, and as a result social inequalities exist.
  • Resourcing - our professional community is proactive in obtaining quality resources for the students at our school. As a result of determination and dedication by individuals, the Ako Hiko trust was established in order to provide equal learning opportunities through digital devices.

Hodkinson and Hodkinson (2004) identify that “learning and social practice are seen as relational” (p. 3) - a change in one contributes to a change in the other. As a professional community, we are faced with challenges constantly, but strive our best to work cooperatively and collaboratively  to overcome these issues as we aim to best cater for the lifelong learning needs of our students.


5. What changes are occurring in the context of your profession?


Within education, changes are happening as we strive to prepare our students to compete in a globally competitive world. This essentially means changing how the profession thinks about learners and learning, with a move towards future-oriented learning.

So how can we address these changes and what can we do?
The change needs to begin with learners and teachers working together to generate new solutions to complex problems, as well as developing relationships with communities as students undertake challenges within real world contexts.

Innovation needs to occur in order for a shift to happen. This can be done partially through the use of digital devices. Technology is a tool that has an important role in enabling and creating new learning opportunities.


At this stage some of my next steps for me to contemplate include:

  • Personalising learning - meeting the learners needs and interests and catering for these through classroom programmes (while I already do this, I'm sure I can improve on this!)
  • Diversity - providing opportunities and experiences for students to develop interpersonal and interrelational skills by working collaboratively with a variety of people
  • Curriculum - equipping students to use, find and apply knowledge, rather than recalling knowledge, thus developing the skills of lifelong learners.
  • Rethinking the learners and teachers roles - developing the concept of Learn, Create, Share by extending the community locally, nationally and globally. Flipping classrooms, allowing opportunities for students to be the teacher, teachers undertaking professional development.



References:

Bolstad, R. & Gilbert, J. with McDowall, S., Bull, A., Boyd, S. & Hipkins, R. (2012) Supporting future-oriented learning & teaching - a New Zealand perspective. Minstry of Education, New Zealand. Retrieved from https://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/109317/994_Future-oriented-07062012.pdf 

Haydon, R. & Percy, E. (2015). May Road School: Community Engagement with Blogging. Retrieved from http://mrscommunityengagement.blogspot.co.nz/2015/05/ethnic-breakdown-of-students-who-attend.html

Hodkinson, P. & Hodkinson, H. (2004) A Constructive Critique of Communities of Practice: Moving Beyond Lave and Wenger. Lifelong Learning Institute, University of Leeds, UK.

May Road School. (2015). Retrieved from http://www.mayroad.school.nz/

May Road School (2015) May Road School Strategic Plan.

Friday, 19 June 2015

Activity 3: Responses to Finlay's (2008) Article

The term “reflective practice” varies depending on the level, individual, organisation and context. Finlay (2008) summarises the term as “the process of learning through and from experience towards gaining new insights of self and/or practice” (p. 1). Reflective practice involves individuals having self-awareness, and being able to critically evaluate their own responses. The purpose of reflective practice is to think critically about experiences in order to develop new understandings so that future practice can be improved upon.


As a teacher, this concept resonates strongly with me. I am constantly reflecting upon my teaching practice and how I can improve upon it, but am I critically reflecting upon my practice?


The New Zealand Registered Teachers Criteria “recognise that teaching is a highly complex activity, drawing on repertoires of knowledge, practices, professional attributes and values to facilitate academic, social and cultural learning for diverse education settings” (2009, p. 1).


This is further broken down into teachers being able to  “use critical inquiry and problem solving effectively in their professional practice” (p. 3). Which means that teachers:
  • “Systematically and critically engage with evidence and professional literature to reflect on and refine practice.
  • Respond professionally to feedback from members of their learning community.
  • Critically examine their own beliefs, including cultural beliefs, and how they impact on their professional practice and the achievement of ākonga (all learners)” (p. 3).


With this in mind, I am able to use critical inquiry and problem solving effectively in my professional practice. Teachers don’t just teach. They are learners themselves, and I would consider myself as a learner, who constantly reflects on my practice and trials new strategies in order to improve the my teaching practice and the success of my students. I believe that as long as I continue to teach, there will always be a place for critical reflection.



Finlay (2008) suggests that there are two forms of reflection:
  1. reflection - on - action (thinking about the event after it has occurred)
  2. reflection - in - action (thinking during the event).


I agree with Finlay’s opinion about professionals drawing on “both practical experience and theory In the classroom as they think on their feet and improvise” (2008, p. 4). Teachers have a responsibility to be responsive to their students and if something isn’t working, we reflect on our teaching and lessons by modifying them or looking for alternatives. As educators, both types of reflection are crucial in order to achieve successful outcomes for students, regardless of whether you are in your first year or 20th year of teaching.



Zeichner and Liston (1996) (as cited in Finlay, 2008, p. 4) expand further on reflection by identifying 5 levels of reflection that can occur during teaching:


  1. rapid reflection (immediate, ongoing and automatic action by the teacher)
  2. repair (teacher makes a decision to alter their behaviour in response to students)
  3. review (teacher thinks about, discuss or writes about an element of their teaching practice)
  4. research (teacher engages in systematic and sustained thinking, collects data or reads research)
  5. retheorize and reformulate (teacher critically examines own practice in light of theories)

When I consider Zeichner and Liston’s (1996) work in terms of my own reflection, I actually engage in all 5 levels, however the first 3 levels occur more often due to workload and time pressures. While I am passionate about teaching, at times it can be hard to not let your emotions get in the way. I am constantly striving for self - improvement, and this in itself can be draining, not to mention overwhelming! Teachers need to be aware of what they can and can’t handle, which may mean different levels (and even models) of reflection depending on the situation.

Figure 1. Gibbs Reflective Cycle (The University of Kent, 2012)

Gibbs Reflective Cycle is a reflection model that I would use to think critically about my practice regularly. It is simple, yet provides thought provoking questions that challenge me to think carefully about what I have done well, and what I could do next time in order to improve. This year, I am constantly reflecting with my first digital class. It has been a huge learning curve for myself and my students, and ongoing collaboration, discussions and sharing with my colleagues have helped me to make changes and improvements with my practice.



In my opinion, the idea of reflective practice forms part of the process of lifelong learning. If you don’t question and discuss your practice (particularly with colleagues), how can you critically examine it?

My final thoughts around Finlay’s article are that critical reflection needs to be taught to educators, and regular professional development should be undertaken. As teachers, we should be conducting honest critical reflections in order to benefit ourselves and our teaching practice, the profession and most importantly, our students.


References:
   Finlay, L. (2008). Reflecting on 'Reflective practice'. Practice-based Professional Learning Centre, paper 52. The Open University.

   New Zealand Teachers Council. (2009). Registered Teacher Criteria. Retrieved from https://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/sites/default/files/Registered-Teacher-Criteria-%28English%29.pdf

   The University of Kent. (2012). Gibbs Reflective Cycle. Retrieved from https://www.kent.ac.uk/learning/PDP-and-employability/pdp/reflective.html

Monday, 15 June 2015

Activity 2: Reflection on Learning & Practice


Create a blog post in which you reflect on the last 24 weeks of study. Provide a critical discussion of at least three things you have learned about yourself as a learner and three key changes in your own practice.



Over the last 24 weeks undertaking the Mind Lab’s Digital & Collaborative Postgraduate Certificate Programme, I have been exposed to the stark reality that our education system is undergoing a hugely dramatic change.


As a New Zealand trained teacher who has been in the teaching profession since 2008 (mostly in New Zealand, with a brief stint in the UK), my eyes have been opened to the fact that we MUST prepare today’s students for a world which does not yet exist.

When I applied to the Mind Lab course I approached it with a teacher’s lens and what I could gain from the course and apply in my classroom. I anticipated hands on practical digital learning that would help me develop the way I teach in my first ever fully digital classroom. Whilst I was given new tools to trial in my class, the course has encouraged me to look critically at my own teaching practice, as well as analyse my approach to leadership.

Leadership
2015 has seen me take on the PE Curriculum leadership, and also become our school’s PB4L team leader. Up until this year, I had never deemed myself to be a “leader”. A teacher - yes, but a leader - no. Until one Mind Lab session where we analysed our own personal leadership styles…

If you’re a teacher, you’re a leader! Of course you are! 
You lead your students and facilitate their learning!!

Taking that into consideration, I began to think about all the leadership roles that I undertake everyday: PE curriculum leader, PB4L team leader, Digital classroom teacher, Associate Teacher, Sports coach, and I recently stepped in to cover the ICT leadership role as my colleague is overseas.  

During one Mind Lab session (December 2014) we were asked to complete a leadership quiz. For each leadership style, I scored the following:
Authoritarian 28
Procedural 29
Transformational 36
Participative 43
Laissez Faire 42

For me, the Participative and Laissez Faire results weren’t surprising. My personality is one in which I prefer to discuss and bounce ideas off others, before making decisions. I wouldn’t describe myself as an overly competitive person, and I believe that the staff who I work alongside are professional, so I am happy to draw upon their expertise and delegate tasks to them.

An area that I particularly wanted to focus on was the transformational leadership aspect, particularly in the classroom. While I already felt like I conducted this leadership through my PB4L leadership and behaviour management, I wanted to increase this style in regards to my teaching practise. I believe that I am able to motivate my students in an effective and efficient way, however the big area of improvement is for me to help my students develop strong teamwork and creative collaboration skills. This is my vision for my students, and I am continuing to persevere with helping my students develop these 21st century skills.

Out of interest, I thought it would be worth doing the quiz (in June 2015) to see if my leadership style had been impacted upon after my learning journey through the Mind Lab. Surprisingly, my transformational score stayed the same! However I feel that this may have been partly influenced by the increase in my leadership roles which have taken me out of the classroom more often. It reminds me that I need to keep working closely alongside my students to continue developing their collaborative skills and allow them more opportunities to own their learning.


Collaboration
The Mind Lab’s collaborative constructivist view of teaching and learning supports my school’s current position of digital teaching and learning through our Learn, Create, Share model. As a learner, the course has modelled a collaborative approach to learning - through using google docs with my colleague, creating stop motion animations and videos with peers through to 3D modelling and printing. From this collaboration, I found that when it comes to digital technology I generally prefer to be shown how to do things, then have someone sit alongside me to work with and bounce ideas off or ask questions when I become stuck. Working alongside my ICT savvy colleague throughout the last 24 weeks was ideal for me as I was able to bounce ideas off her outside of the Mind Lab sessions and was encouraged to take more risks in my classroom with her support.
Collaboration has allowed for me to have a change in thinking about what knowledge actually is. From this, I have developed a better understanding of the collaborative learning process that brings learners together in such a way that students are responsible for their own learning as well as the learning of their peers.
In terms of my teaching pedagogy, I need to develop students who are both independent thinkers, but also collaborative learners who can work with others. Within my classroom, I am currently working on developing this collaborative approach, as it involves changing the mindsets of some of my students as well. Ultimately, I would like the students I teach to be able to move forward from collaborating with the peers within the classroom, to collaborating with students all over the world. This is a process that will need to time to develop, and while I am realistic that it may not necessarily happen this year, it is a goal that I am aiming to achieve.

Digital Technology
Something that really resonated with me was a video clip that was shared with us in the beginning weeks of the course. It highlighted the fact that today’s graduates will leave university looking very much like their predecessors. However the 5 year olds that are just beginning school in 2015 will be required to bring and share an entirely new set of skills to their career. With the increase in digital accessibility in all 4 corners of the world, education is now about preparing our students with skills so that they can compete in an international market.

With that in mind, educators in New Zealand are fortunate that the key competencies from The New Zealand Curriculum allow flexibility when providing exciting learning experiences that are relevant, engaging, meaningful, and useful. By teaching through these key competencies we can enable students to become confident, connected, actively involved learners both in the present and in the future. Through this, we help to shape and equip students with the necessary skills to participate in rapidly changing local, national, and global communities. This reflects my own personal teaching philosophy in that I want to encourage my students to become lifelong learners, who are active problem solvers.
The introduction of digital devices provides an opportunity for us to develop these 21st century skills and approach teaching and learning in a meaningful way that enhances the learning experiences and increases the ownership of students outcomes. This is a major factor in why I was so keen to get onboard with having a 1-1 digital class.
As mentioned above, I have found that as a learner myself, I prefer to be shown how to use tools. However, this is a completely different mindset from some of the students or “digital natives” in my class. Many of my students are passionate about using technology and exploring for themselves. They are always keen to try new things. As a teacher, I found it quite challenging to cater for all the needs of my students when teaching them how to use their chromebooks and google drive. It was overwhelming at times as some students were quick to learn how to use the digital tool, while others needed lots of repetition. After attending the Mind Lab sessions all I wanted to do was to take what I had learnt and trial it IMMEDIATELY in my classroom. At times I became extremely frustrated, until a colleague (in her second year with a digital class) suggested that I teach the my students how to use the tools one at a time and establish the routines around the digital devices. For me, this was a learning curve where I realised that it is ok to go slow: Do the basics and do them well.

In that respect, I learnt that I needed to teach my students the basics, and how to to use them well, before moving onto other tools. My students can now do the basics well (Yippee!!). With that in mind, I am pleased to say that I have implemented the following tools (with success!) into my classroom:
  • Booktracks Classroom - students have been able to read online, but also construct their own writing with their own soundtracks
  • Bitstrips Animation - create their own avatars to use as motivation for character descriptions
  • Pecha Kucha - in preparation for speeches, using a pecha kucha to develop their confidence when speaking about a topic in front of the class
  • Kahoot It Quiz - engaging students in maths and revising maths and science concepts
And in the future, I intend to trial with my students:
  • Stop motion animation - to create videos in order to share their learning
  • Scratch and coding - for maths, particularly in terms of geometry
  • Augmented reality through Aurasma - linking artwork to students mihi’s
  • Video creation and editing - again, to create videos in order to share the learning (although the opportunities are endless here!!)
  • Flipped classrooms
  • Using design thinking for students goal setting, rather than SMART goals.

The purpose of trialling these tools is to experiment and expose my students to various ways of creating and sharing their learning with a wider audience.


Upon reflecting on my learning over the 24 weeks, it is evident that one of the major challenges is the changing of a mindset. Like any teacher, I want my students to be the best that they can be, and that requires me to be the best teacher I can be. To achieve this, I need to foster both within myself, and my students, a growth mindset.  Doing so will allow for the students that I have taught to become confident, connected, actively involved learners who can engage with a global community.

References:
The University of Kent Careers and Employability Service. (2011). How to find out your leadership style. Retrieved from http://www.kent.ac.uk/careers/sk/leadership.htm